Victoria indicators

Wall mode

All measures Getting around

Share of trips on foot, by bike or by bus

Area: CRD growth management area 2022 household travel survey

29.0% of all trips

In 5 years Better+2.4 pt vs 2017
In 5 years Better+2.4 pt since 2017
Against Region’s target (42%)13.0 pts below

Set by the CRD for this region, for 2038. No year-by-year path is published, so the gap is shown without a met or missed label. Targets and comparisons

Source: Capital Regional District. We read it on Nov 12, 2026.

Check this numberOpen the report at page 24 (agency site)

Over time

Time range

Share of all trips by mode, Growth Management Planning Area (%)

2022 By year

  • Walking, cycling and transit 29.0%
  • Walking 14.6%
  • Cycling 7.9%
  • Transit 6.5%

CRD target: 42% by 2038

Line chart of 4 lines, 2 periods from 2017 to 2022. Walking, cycling and transit: starts at 26.6% (2017), ends at 29.0% (2022); highest 29.0% (2022), lowest 26.6% (2017). Walking: starts at 13.7% (2017), ends at 14.6% (2022); highest 14.6% (2022), lowest 13.7% (2017). Cycling: starts at 5.1% (2017), ends at 7.9% (2022); highest 7.9% (2022), lowest 5.1% (2017). Transit: starts at 7.8% (2017), ends at 6.5% (2022); highest 7.8% (2017), lowest 6.5% (2022). A dashed horizontal line marks the Regional Growth Strategy target: 42% of trips by walking, cycling and transit by 2038 (CRD) at 42.0. Short ticks on the top edge mark general election days: Local election: Oct 20, 2018; Oct 15, 2022. Every value is in the table.0204060%20222017Local election, Oct 20, 2018Local election, Oct 15, 20222017: Walking, cycling and transit: 26.6%; Walking: 13.7%; Cycling: 5.1%; Transit: 7.8%2022: Walking, cycling and transit: 29.0%; Walking: 14.6%; Cycling: 7.9%; Transit: 6.5%
Line chart of 4 lines, 2 periods from 2017 to 2022. Walking, cycling and transit: starts at 26.6% (2017), ends at 29.0% (2022); highest 29.0% (2022), lowest 26.6% (2017). Walking: starts at 13.7% (2017), ends at 14.6% (2022); highest 14.6% (2022), lowest 13.7% (2017). Cycling: starts at 5.1% (2017), ends at 7.9% (2022); highest 7.9% (2022), lowest 5.1% (2017). Transit: starts at 7.8% (2017), ends at 6.5% (2022); highest 7.8% (2017), lowest 6.5% (2022). A dashed horizontal line marks the Regional Growth Strategy target: 42% of trips by walking, cycling and transit by 2038 (CRD) at 42.0. Short ticks on the top edge mark general election days: Local election: Oct 20, 2018; Oct 15, 2022. Every value is in the table.0204060%20222017Local election, Oct 20, 2018Local election, Oct 15, 20222017: Walking, cycling and transit: 26.6%; Walking: 13.7%; Cycling: 5.1%; Transit: 7.8%2022: Walking, cycling and transit: 29.0%; Walking: 14.6%; Cycling: 7.9%; Transit: 6.5%
Line chart of 4 lines, 2 periods from 2017 to 2022. Walking, cycling and transit: starts at 26.6% (2017), ends at 29.0% (2022); highest 29.0% (2022), lowest 26.6% (2017). Walking: starts at 13.7% (2017), ends at 14.6% (2022); highest 14.6% (2022), lowest 13.7% (2017). Cycling: starts at 5.1% (2017), ends at 7.9% (2022); highest 7.9% (2022), lowest 5.1% (2017). Transit: starts at 7.8% (2017), ends at 6.5% (2022); highest 7.8% (2017), lowest 6.5% (2022). A dashed horizontal line marks the Regional Growth Strategy target: 42% of trips by walking, cycling and transit by 2038 (CRD) at 42.0. Short ticks on the top edge mark general election days: Local election: Oct 20, 2018; Oct 15, 2022. Every value is in the table.0204060%20222017Local election, Oct 20, 2018Local election, Oct 15, 2022Walking,cycling andtransit 29.0Walking 14.6Cycling 7.9Transit 6.52017: Walking, cycling and transit: 26.6%; Walking: 13.7%; Cycling: 5.1%; Transit: 7.8%2022: Walking, cycling and transit: 29.0%; Walking: 14.6%; Cycling: 7.9%; Transit: 6.5%
Line chart of 4 lines, 2 periods from 2017 to 2022. Walking, cycling and transit: starts at 26.6% (2017), ends at 29.0% (2022); highest 29.0% (2022), lowest 26.6% (2017). Walking: starts at 13.7% (2017), ends at 14.6% (2022); highest 14.6% (2022), lowest 13.7% (2017). Cycling: starts at 5.1% (2017), ends at 7.9% (2022); highest 7.9% (2022), lowest 5.1% (2017). Transit: starts at 7.8% (2017), ends at 6.5% (2022); highest 7.8% (2017), lowest 6.5% (2022). A dashed horizontal line marks the Regional Growth Strategy target: 42% of trips by walking, cycling and transit by 2038 (CRD) at 42.0. Short ticks on the top edge mark general election days: Local election: Oct 20, 2018; Oct 15, 2022. Every value is in the table.0204060%20222017Local election, Oct 20, 2018Local election, Oct 15, 2022Walking, cycling andtransit 29.0Walking 14.6Cycling 7.9Transit 6.52017: Walking, cycling and transit: 26.6%; Walking: 13.7%; Cycling: 5.1%; Transit: 7.8%2022: Walking, cycling and transit: 29.0%; Walking: 14.6%; Cycling: 7.9%; Transit: 6.5%

Tap or drag on the chart to read any year.

M municipal election: Oct 20, 2018; Oct 15, 2022

About these ticks

Share of all trips by mode, Growth Management Planning Area (%)

2022 By year

  • Walking, cycling and transit 29.0%
  • Walking 14.6%
  • Cycling 7.9%
  • Transit 6.5%

CRD target: 42% by 2038

Line chart of 4 lines, 2 periods from 2017 to 2022. Walking, cycling and transit: starts at 26.6% (2017), ends at 29.0% (2022); highest 29.0% (2022), lowest 26.6% (2017). Walking: starts at 13.7% (2017), ends at 14.6% (2022); highest 14.6% (2022), lowest 13.7% (2017). Cycling: starts at 5.1% (2017), ends at 7.9% (2022); highest 7.9% (2022), lowest 5.1% (2017). Transit: starts at 7.8% (2017), ends at 6.5% (2022); highest 7.8% (2017), lowest 6.5% (2022). A dashed horizontal line marks the Regional Growth Strategy target: 42% of trips by walking, cycling and transit by 2038 (CRD) at 42.0. Short ticks on the top edge mark general election days: Local election: Oct 20, 2018; Oct 15, 2022. Every value is in the table.0204060%20222017Local election, Oct 20, 2018Local election, Oct 15, 20222017: Walking, cycling and transit: 26.6%; Walking: 13.7%; Cycling: 5.1%; Transit: 7.8%2022: Walking, cycling and transit: 29.0%; Walking: 14.6%; Cycling: 7.9%; Transit: 6.5%
Line chart of 4 lines, 2 periods from 2017 to 2022. Walking, cycling and transit: starts at 26.6% (2017), ends at 29.0% (2022); highest 29.0% (2022), lowest 26.6% (2017). Walking: starts at 13.7% (2017), ends at 14.6% (2022); highest 14.6% (2022), lowest 13.7% (2017). Cycling: starts at 5.1% (2017), ends at 7.9% (2022); highest 7.9% (2022), lowest 5.1% (2017). Transit: starts at 7.8% (2017), ends at 6.5% (2022); highest 7.8% (2017), lowest 6.5% (2022). A dashed horizontal line marks the Regional Growth Strategy target: 42% of trips by walking, cycling and transit by 2038 (CRD) at 42.0. Short ticks on the top edge mark general election days: Local election: Oct 20, 2018; Oct 15, 2022. Every value is in the table.0204060%20222017Local election, Oct 20, 2018Local election, Oct 15, 20222017: Walking, cycling and transit: 26.6%; Walking: 13.7%; Cycling: 5.1%; Transit: 7.8%2022: Walking, cycling and transit: 29.0%; Walking: 14.6%; Cycling: 7.9%; Transit: 6.5%
Line chart of 4 lines, 2 periods from 2017 to 2022. Walking, cycling and transit: starts at 26.6% (2017), ends at 29.0% (2022); highest 29.0% (2022), lowest 26.6% (2017). Walking: starts at 13.7% (2017), ends at 14.6% (2022); highest 14.6% (2022), lowest 13.7% (2017). Cycling: starts at 5.1% (2017), ends at 7.9% (2022); highest 7.9% (2022), lowest 5.1% (2017). Transit: starts at 7.8% (2017), ends at 6.5% (2022); highest 7.8% (2017), lowest 6.5% (2022). A dashed horizontal line marks the Regional Growth Strategy target: 42% of trips by walking, cycling and transit by 2038 (CRD) at 42.0. Short ticks on the top edge mark general election days: Local election: Oct 20, 2018; Oct 15, 2022. Every value is in the table.0204060%20222017Local election, Oct 20, 2018Local election, Oct 15, 2022Walking,cycling andtransit 29.0Walking 14.6Cycling 7.9Transit 6.52017: Walking, cycling and transit: 26.6%; Walking: 13.7%; Cycling: 5.1%; Transit: 7.8%2022: Walking, cycling and transit: 29.0%; Walking: 14.6%; Cycling: 7.9%; Transit: 6.5%
Line chart of 4 lines, 2 periods from 2017 to 2022. Walking, cycling and transit: starts at 26.6% (2017), ends at 29.0% (2022); highest 29.0% (2022), lowest 26.6% (2017). Walking: starts at 13.7% (2017), ends at 14.6% (2022); highest 14.6% (2022), lowest 13.7% (2017). Cycling: starts at 5.1% (2017), ends at 7.9% (2022); highest 7.9% (2022), lowest 5.1% (2017). Transit: starts at 7.8% (2017), ends at 6.5% (2022); highest 7.8% (2017), lowest 6.5% (2022). A dashed horizontal line marks the Regional Growth Strategy target: 42% of trips by walking, cycling and transit by 2038 (CRD) at 42.0. Short ticks on the top edge mark general election days: Local election: Oct 20, 2018; Oct 15, 2022. Every value is in the table.0204060%20222017Local election, Oct 20, 2018Local election, Oct 15, 2022Walking, cycling andtransit 29.0Walking 14.6Cycling 7.9Transit 6.52017: Walking, cycling and transit: 26.6%; Walking: 13.7%; Cycling: 5.1%; Transit: 7.8%2022: Walking, cycling and transit: 29.0%; Walking: 14.6%; Cycling: 7.9%; Transit: 6.5%

Tap or drag on the chart to read any year.

M municipal election: Oct 20, 2018; Oct 15, 2022

About these ticks

Share of all trips by mode, Growth Management Planning Area (%)

2022 By year

  • Walking, cycling and transit 29.0%
  • Walking 14.6%
  • Cycling 7.9%
  • Transit 6.5%

CRD target: 42% by 2038

Line chart of 4 lines, 4 periods from 2006 to 2022. Walking, cycling and transit: starts at 20.5% (2006), ends at 29.0% (2022); highest 29.0% (2022), lowest 20.5% (2006). Walking: starts at 10.0% (2006), ends at 14.6% (2022); highest 14.6% (2022), lowest 10.0% (2006). Cycling: starts at 3.5% (2006), ends at 7.9% (2022); highest 7.9% (2022), lowest 2.7% (2011). Transit: starts at 7.0% (2006), ends at 6.5% (2022); highest 7.8% (2017), lowest 6.5% (2011). A dashed horizontal line marks the Regional Growth Strategy target: 42% of trips by walking, cycling and transit by 2038 (CRD) at 42.0. Short ticks on the top edge mark general election days: Local election: Nov 19, 2011; Nov 15, 2014; Oct 20, 2018; Oct 15, 2022. Every value is in the table.0204060%2022201720112006Local election, Nov 19, 2011Local election, Nov 15, 2014Local election, Oct 20, 2018Local election, Oct 15, 20222006: Walking, cycling and transit: 20.5%; Walking: 10.0%; Cycling: 3.5%; Transit: 7.0%2011: Walking, cycling and transit: 22.4%; Walking: 13.2%; Cycling: 2.7%; Transit: 6.5%2017: Walking, cycling and transit: 26.6%; Walking: 13.7%; Cycling: 5.1%; Transit: 7.8%2022: Walking, cycling and transit: 29.0%; Walking: 14.6%; Cycling: 7.9%; Transit: 6.5%
Line chart of 4 lines, 4 periods from 2006 to 2022. Walking, cycling and transit: starts at 20.5% (2006), ends at 29.0% (2022); highest 29.0% (2022), lowest 20.5% (2006). Walking: starts at 10.0% (2006), ends at 14.6% (2022); highest 14.6% (2022), lowest 10.0% (2006). Cycling: starts at 3.5% (2006), ends at 7.9% (2022); highest 7.9% (2022), lowest 2.7% (2011). Transit: starts at 7.0% (2006), ends at 6.5% (2022); highest 7.8% (2017), lowest 6.5% (2011). A dashed horizontal line marks the Regional Growth Strategy target: 42% of trips by walking, cycling and transit by 2038 (CRD) at 42.0. Short ticks on the top edge mark general election days: Local election: Nov 19, 2011; Nov 15, 2014; Oct 20, 2018; Oct 15, 2022. Every value is in the table.0204060%2022201720112006Local election, Nov 19, 2011Local election, Nov 15, 2014Local election, Oct 20, 2018Local election, Oct 15, 20222006: Walking, cycling and transit: 20.5%; Walking: 10.0%; Cycling: 3.5%; Transit: 7.0%2011: Walking, cycling and transit: 22.4%; Walking: 13.2%; Cycling: 2.7%; Transit: 6.5%2017: Walking, cycling and transit: 26.6%; Walking: 13.7%; Cycling: 5.1%; Transit: 7.8%2022: Walking, cycling and transit: 29.0%; Walking: 14.6%; Cycling: 7.9%; Transit: 6.5%
Line chart of 4 lines, 4 periods from 2006 to 2022. Walking, cycling and transit: starts at 20.5% (2006), ends at 29.0% (2022); highest 29.0% (2022), lowest 20.5% (2006). Walking: starts at 10.0% (2006), ends at 14.6% (2022); highest 14.6% (2022), lowest 10.0% (2006). Cycling: starts at 3.5% (2006), ends at 7.9% (2022); highest 7.9% (2022), lowest 2.7% (2011). Transit: starts at 7.0% (2006), ends at 6.5% (2022); highest 7.8% (2017), lowest 6.5% (2011). A dashed horizontal line marks the Regional Growth Strategy target: 42% of trips by walking, cycling and transit by 2038 (CRD) at 42.0. Short ticks on the top edge mark general election days: Local election: Nov 19, 2011; Nov 15, 2014; Oct 20, 2018; Oct 15, 2022. Every value is in the table.0204060%2022201720112006Local election, Nov 19, 2011Local election, Nov 15, 2014Local election, Oct 20, 2018Local election, Oct 15, 2022Walking,cycling andtransit 29.0Walking 14.6Cycling 7.9Transit 6.52006: Walking, cycling and transit: 20.5%; Walking: 10.0%; Cycling: 3.5%; Transit: 7.0%2011: Walking, cycling and transit: 22.4%; Walking: 13.2%; Cycling: 2.7%; Transit: 6.5%2017: Walking, cycling and transit: 26.6%; Walking: 13.7%; Cycling: 5.1%; Transit: 7.8%2022: Walking, cycling and transit: 29.0%; Walking: 14.6%; Cycling: 7.9%; Transit: 6.5%
Line chart of 4 lines, 4 periods from 2006 to 2022. Walking, cycling and transit: starts at 20.5% (2006), ends at 29.0% (2022); highest 29.0% (2022), lowest 20.5% (2006). Walking: starts at 10.0% (2006), ends at 14.6% (2022); highest 14.6% (2022), lowest 10.0% (2006). Cycling: starts at 3.5% (2006), ends at 7.9% (2022); highest 7.9% (2022), lowest 2.7% (2011). Transit: starts at 7.0% (2006), ends at 6.5% (2022); highest 7.8% (2017), lowest 6.5% (2011). A dashed horizontal line marks the Regional Growth Strategy target: 42% of trips by walking, cycling and transit by 2038 (CRD) at 42.0. Short ticks on the top edge mark general election days: Local election: Nov 19, 2011; Nov 15, 2014; Oct 20, 2018; Oct 15, 2022. Every value is in the table.0204060%2022201720112006Local election, Nov 19, 2011Local election, Nov 15, 2014Local election, Oct 20, 2018Local election, Oct 15, 2022Walking, cycling andtransit 29.0Walking 14.6Cycling 7.9Transit 6.52006: Walking, cycling and transit: 20.5%; Walking: 10.0%; Cycling: 3.5%; Transit: 7.0%2011: Walking, cycling and transit: 22.4%; Walking: 13.2%; Cycling: 2.7%; Transit: 6.5%2017: Walking, cycling and transit: 26.6%; Walking: 13.7%; Cycling: 5.1%; Transit: 7.8%2022: Walking, cycling and transit: 29.0%; Walking: 14.6%; Cycling: 7.9%; Transit: 6.5%

Tap or drag on the chart to read any year. Spacing follows the calendar, so years without a figure show as wider gaps.

M municipal election: Nov 19, 2011; Nov 15, 2014; Oct 20, 2018; Oct 15, 2022Local elections before 2011 are not marked.

About these ticks

Share of all trips by mode, Growth Management Planning Area (%)

2022 By year

  • Walking, cycling and transit 29.0%
  • Walking 14.6%
  • Cycling 7.9%
  • Transit 6.5%

CRD target: 42% by 2038

Line chart of 4 lines, 5 periods from 2001 to 2022. Walking, cycling and transit: starts at 21.2% (2001), ends at 29.0% (2022); highest 29.0% (2022), lowest 20.5% (2006). Walking: starts at 11.7% (2001), ends at 14.6% (2022); highest 14.6% (2022), lowest 10.0% (2006). Cycling: starts at 2.6% (2001), ends at 7.9% (2022); highest 7.9% (2022), lowest 2.6% (2001). Transit: starts at 6.9% (2001), ends at 6.5% (2022); highest 7.8% (2017), lowest 6.5% (2011). A dashed horizontal line marks the Regional Growth Strategy target: 42% of trips by walking, cycling and transit by 2038 (CRD) at 42.0. Short ticks on the top edge mark general election days: Local election: Nov 19, 2011; Nov 15, 2014; Oct 20, 2018; Oct 15, 2022. Every value is in the table.0204060%202220112001Local election, Nov 19, 2011Local election, Nov 15, 2014Local election, Oct 20, 2018Local election, Oct 15, 20222001: Walking, cycling and transit: 21.2%; Walking: 11.7%; Cycling: 2.6%; Transit: 6.9%2006: Walking, cycling and transit: 20.5%; Walking: 10.0%; Cycling: 3.5%; Transit: 7.0%2011: Walking, cycling and transit: 22.4%; Walking: 13.2%; Cycling: 2.7%; Transit: 6.5%2017: Walking, cycling and transit: 26.6%; Walking: 13.7%; Cycling: 5.1%; Transit: 7.8%2022: Walking, cycling and transit: 29.0%; Walking: 14.6%; Cycling: 7.9%; Transit: 6.5%
Line chart of 4 lines, 5 periods from 2001 to 2022. Walking, cycling and transit: starts at 21.2% (2001), ends at 29.0% (2022); highest 29.0% (2022), lowest 20.5% (2006). Walking: starts at 11.7% (2001), ends at 14.6% (2022); highest 14.6% (2022), lowest 10.0% (2006). Cycling: starts at 2.6% (2001), ends at 7.9% (2022); highest 7.9% (2022), lowest 2.6% (2001). Transit: starts at 6.9% (2001), ends at 6.5% (2022); highest 7.8% (2017), lowest 6.5% (2011). A dashed horizontal line marks the Regional Growth Strategy target: 42% of trips by walking, cycling and transit by 2038 (CRD) at 42.0. Short ticks on the top edge mark general election days: Local election: Nov 19, 2011; Nov 15, 2014; Oct 20, 2018; Oct 15, 2022. Every value is in the table.0204060%20222017201120062001Local election, Nov 19, 2011Local election, Nov 15, 2014Local election, Oct 20, 2018Local election, Oct 15, 20222001: Walking, cycling and transit: 21.2%; Walking: 11.7%; Cycling: 2.6%; Transit: 6.9%2006: Walking, cycling and transit: 20.5%; Walking: 10.0%; Cycling: 3.5%; Transit: 7.0%2011: Walking, cycling and transit: 22.4%; Walking: 13.2%; Cycling: 2.7%; Transit: 6.5%2017: Walking, cycling and transit: 26.6%; Walking: 13.7%; Cycling: 5.1%; Transit: 7.8%2022: Walking, cycling and transit: 29.0%; Walking: 14.6%; Cycling: 7.9%; Transit: 6.5%
Line chart of 4 lines, 5 periods from 2001 to 2022. Walking, cycling and transit: starts at 21.2% (2001), ends at 29.0% (2022); highest 29.0% (2022), lowest 20.5% (2006). Walking: starts at 11.7% (2001), ends at 14.6% (2022); highest 14.6% (2022), lowest 10.0% (2006). Cycling: starts at 2.6% (2001), ends at 7.9% (2022); highest 7.9% (2022), lowest 2.6% (2001). Transit: starts at 6.9% (2001), ends at 6.5% (2022); highest 7.8% (2017), lowest 6.5% (2011). A dashed horizontal line marks the Regional Growth Strategy target: 42% of trips by walking, cycling and transit by 2038 (CRD) at 42.0. Short ticks on the top edge mark general election days: Local election: Nov 19, 2011; Nov 15, 2014; Oct 20, 2018; Oct 15, 2022. Every value is in the table.0204060%20222017201120062001Local election, Nov 19, 2011Local election, Nov 15, 2014Local election, Oct 20, 2018Local election, Oct 15, 2022Walking,cycling andtransit 29.0Walking 14.6Cycling 7.9Transit 6.52001: Walking, cycling and transit: 21.2%; Walking: 11.7%; Cycling: 2.6%; Transit: 6.9%2006: Walking, cycling and transit: 20.5%; Walking: 10.0%; Cycling: 3.5%; Transit: 7.0%2011: Walking, cycling and transit: 22.4%; Walking: 13.2%; Cycling: 2.7%; Transit: 6.5%2017: Walking, cycling and transit: 26.6%; Walking: 13.7%; Cycling: 5.1%; Transit: 7.8%2022: Walking, cycling and transit: 29.0%; Walking: 14.6%; Cycling: 7.9%; Transit: 6.5%
Line chart of 4 lines, 5 periods from 2001 to 2022. Walking, cycling and transit: starts at 21.2% (2001), ends at 29.0% (2022); highest 29.0% (2022), lowest 20.5% (2006). Walking: starts at 11.7% (2001), ends at 14.6% (2022); highest 14.6% (2022), lowest 10.0% (2006). Cycling: starts at 2.6% (2001), ends at 7.9% (2022); highest 7.9% (2022), lowest 2.6% (2001). Transit: starts at 6.9% (2001), ends at 6.5% (2022); highest 7.8% (2017), lowest 6.5% (2011). A dashed horizontal line marks the Regional Growth Strategy target: 42% of trips by walking, cycling and transit by 2038 (CRD) at 42.0. Short ticks on the top edge mark general election days: Local election: Nov 19, 2011; Nov 15, 2014; Oct 20, 2018; Oct 15, 2022. Every value is in the table.0204060%20222017201120062001Local election, Nov 19, 2011Local election, Nov 15, 2014Local election, Oct 20, 2018Local election, Oct 15, 2022Walking, cycling andtransit 29.0Walking 14.6Cycling 7.9Transit 6.52001: Walking, cycling and transit: 21.2%; Walking: 11.7%; Cycling: 2.6%; Transit: 6.9%2006: Walking, cycling and transit: 20.5%; Walking: 10.0%; Cycling: 3.5%; Transit: 7.0%2011: Walking, cycling and transit: 22.4%; Walking: 13.2%; Cycling: 2.7%; Transit: 6.5%2017: Walking, cycling and transit: 26.6%; Walking: 13.7%; Cycling: 5.1%; Transit: 7.8%2022: Walking, cycling and transit: 29.0%; Walking: 14.6%; Cycling: 7.9%; Transit: 6.5%

Tap or drag on the chart to read any year. Spacing follows the calendar, so years without a figure show as wider gaps.

M municipal election: Nov 19, 2011; Nov 15, 2014; Oct 20, 2018; Oct 15, 2022Local elections before 2011 are not marked.

About these ticks

Targets and comparisons

Adopted target

How targets are chosen

Show the numbers as a table
Share of all trips by mode, Growth Management Planning Area (%) (newest first)
PeriodWalking, cycling and transitWalkingCyclingTransit
202229.014.67.96.5
201726.613.75.17.8
201122.413.22.76.5
200620.510.03.57.0
200121.211.72.66.9

How it compares

Capital Regional District, 2022, %. Comparisons are not goals.

Walking, cycling and transit29.0%Walking14.6%Cycling7.9%Transit6.5%Target42.0%

Who decides

Capital Regional District Board. Adopts the regional growth strategy, which sets the region’s transportation goals. Local Government Act, s. 429

Show the 2 other bodies and the laws
Who decides what: Share of trips on foot, by bike or by bus
BodyWhat it decidesLaw or bylaw
Capital Regional District BoardAdopts the regional growth strategy, which sets the region’s transportation goals.Local Government Act, s. 429
Victoria Regional Transit CommissionSets bus fares and service standards in Greater Victoria, within budgets set by BC Transit.British Columbia Transit Act, s. 25 (12)
Municipal councils of Greater Victoria (13)Each council owns and manages its local roads.Community Charter, s. 35

Councils: last general local election October 17, 2026; next on October 19, 2030, the third Saturday of October set by the Local Government Act, s. 52.

Each row says what a body decides and links to the law, order or bylaw that gives it that role. It does not say who caused a change: markets, households and other governments also move these numbers. Who decides what, for every measure · How we choose

What this number does not show

  • From the CRD’s Origin Destination Household Travel Survey, done about every five years; the next is in 2027. The three shares are read from the labels of the CRD’s chart and added here.
One more limit
  • The CRD revised its target from 45% to 42% of all trips, to match BC Transit’s revised transit target.

See the 18 things not measured yet

In plain words

Up 2.4 points since 2017. Up 2.4 points since 2017.

Out of all trips residents of the CRD’s Growth Management Planning Area make, the share made walking, cycling or on transit, from the CRD’s household travel survey, next to the regional target.

How we decide “Better”

The change is 9.0% of the earlier value, at or above the 5% threshold.

A higher share means more trips are made without a car, as the regional strategy aims for. 29.0% of trips in 2022 (walking 14.6%, cycling 7.9%, transit 6.5%), against 26.6% in 2017. The Regional Growth Strategy target is 42% by 2038.

Outcome measures read Better, Worse or About the same; published government targets read Ahead of, On or Behind target; value-judgement measures read Rising, Falling or Steady in a neutral colour. A change smaller than the agency's own margin of error, or otherwise smaller than 5% of the earlier value, is About the same (or Steady). No change is calculated across a marked break in a series. The rule.

All notes on this number

Why it matters. The regional growth strategy aims for more trips without a car, for less traffic and lower emissions.

  • From the CRD’s Origin Destination Household Travel Survey, done about every five years; the next is in 2027. The three shares are read from the labels of the CRD’s chart and added here.
  • The CRD revised its target from 45% to 42% of all trips, to match BC Transit’s revised transit target.
  • The 2022 survey was taken during the recovery from the pandemic, which lowered bus ridership.

Which places

Area: CRD growth management area

The Capital Regional District’s Growth Management Planning Area: the 13 municipalities and the Juan de Fuca electoral area.

Included

  • The 13 municipalities of the Capital Region
  • The Juan de Fuca electoral area

Not included

  • Salt Spring Island and the Southern Gulf Islands, which have their own planning

Official definition

How the agency describes it: CRD Growth Management Planning Area.

How we got it

This number is published by the agency as shown; it is not calculated here. The script reads it from the agency’s own document and refuses to show it unless the expected text is found.

Licence and credits

This figure is public but not under an open licence: the agency publishes it for anyone to read, and it is shown here with credit and a link to the agency’s terms. About licences.

Licence
Public data, not under an open licence. Used with attribution. Agency’s terms of use
Updated by agency
About every five years (CRD Origin Destination Household Travel Survey; next 2027); latest release Feb 18, 2026
Retrieved
Nov 12, 2026, 10:30 PM B.C. time

Source: Capital Regional District, Regional Growth Strategy Indicators Report (2025 edition). Public document, used with attribution; not endorsed by the publisher.